Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

My blood boils… again

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

Will the dirty tricks never end? Voter Supression in the 21st century. Do we really need any more reasons to give the GOP a pink slip?

How can we trust Republicans to build, uphold, and maintain liberty and freedom in Iraq when they’re so busy resisting it in America?

And Dave will vote for…

Monday, November 6th, 2006

I don’t like the idea of media outlets (which, technically, this blog is) telling people how they should vote. Choosing our representatives is an important, personal issue. People have to decide for themselves, and I consider it almost sanctimonious to tell people how to vote.

Before I reveal who I’m voting for, I only have one thing to say, and it’s this: our Congress has failed us completely and utterly. It is, as far as I’m concerned, the most cynical, lazy, corrupt, and craven legislative body we have ever had the misfortune of being represented by. When I read about how utterly poor a job the 109th Congress has performed, how insecure our democracy has become (and I am a constant defender of technology, by the way), what they will do to take away others’ votes, and how swiftly our basic liberties are being chipped away, it makes my blood boil. It would be funny if it weren’t so damn serious. Tomorrow is America’s chance to give these snakes, charlatans, pigs and cowards their performance reviews, and to tell them to get the hell out of our government.

Senate
I will be voting for Jon Tester. Conrad Burns has embarrassed Montanans too many times. From references to the ‘niggers’ in Washington, D.C. to his assertion that out-of-state volunteer firefighters are doing a ‘piss-poor job’, this bitter, shrivelled old fuck has let us down too often. He says he delivers for Montana, but Tester’s plan of attack — to get the appropriations we need without sneaking them is — is the kind of reformed thinking we need in Washington. Tester feels more honest, as well. I hear that Bush and Burns have a secret plan to end the war in Iraq… and we all know how well secret plans work out (*cough, cough,* Nixon). He’s also run a cleaner campaign. I am sick to death of all the political ads, but I’ve noticed that Tester’s ads occasionally do not attack Burns at all. Burns also pledged to only serve two terms (this would be term four, by the way), but now he has become the entrenched, stagnant Washington insider he swore we would never see. Finally, I have one word — Abramoff. If ever there were an embodiment of the sleaze that the Beltway encircles, it’s Burns.

House
Ah, how we have almost forgotten the lower house. All the attention has been focused on Burns and Tester. The fact that he voted for the Military Commissions Act alone is enough for me to want him out of office. The icing on the cake is that Lindeen touts independent thought and review for legislation, not towing the party line. Rehberg is not nearly as big a scoundrel as Burns, but his near-automatic approval of the Bush angenda makes me angry enough to want to boot him.

I am a strong believer in term limits; we need to give politicians a reason to justify their continued employment. And I don’t think that how long a candidate’s family has lived in their state matters much, either — Mansfield wasn’t a native, but look at the amazing things he did.

My politics fall well left of the Democratic party’s ‘safety zone’, but I am going to trust them this time around, to steer our miserable Houses into some direction besides ‘staying the course.’ In the end, you should vote after careful research of the facts, ignoring what the ads say, and with everyone (not just yourself) in mind. Please vote. It is, above all, our most important duty. The government represents us, after all, and we have a strong voice. Tomorrow, let it resound, from school gyms to University Commons to city halls, that, to quote Bob Dylan, “a hard rain’s a-gonna fall” and, to quote Twisted Sister, “we’re not gonna take it anymore.”

Oh Boy… Election

Thursday, October 12th, 2006

Is there anything more cowardly than the politician running for re-election? He’ll say anything, lie about anything, and not do anything in order to get re-elected. The challengers running against them are little better. I wish that just once, someone with scruples, principles, and morals would run for office.

Letter to the Kaimin

Saturday, September 30th, 2006

Note: The ‘scene’ I was referring to was an all-too-common one: idiots on both sides of a debate yelling at one another. In this case, it was an anti-abortion raving lunatic with a sign depicting a dead fetus on one side and ill-informed college kids on the other.

Dear Editor,

The scene outside the UC on Monday illustrates the sad state of public discourse today. The context of the confrontation – preachers with signs shouting at passersby, and vice-versa – demonstrates that too often, these issues boil down to one group of idiots yelling at another. The abortion debate is tough because it involves an ethical decision. Factions on either side of the divide scramble to find facts that support their position, but they come up empty-handed. Sadly, there is no way to logically prove that one side or another is correct. We choose based on our own gut feelings about the issue. We cannot resolve the debate cleanly because no solution exists that would satisfy both sides equally. So in the heat of the moment, the pro-choicers and pro-lifers cannot recall the arguments they have constructed, and are left screaming epithets and trite, meaningless catchphrases like “My body, my choice” and “every life has value” at each other. Clearly they are in the wrong frame of mind. A solution to the perceived problem involves negotiation and compromise, not cursing and covering one’s ears. These solutions are not limited to just the abortion issue, but every political debate we engage in. Unfortunately, name-calling and sloganeering often elicit more of a response in people than level-headed debate, which is why scenes like Monday’s are all too common.

Google and China

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

I’ve been thinking about Google and China, and I don’t understand why Google would concede to the Chinese Government’s demands that Google China censor its search results. The billion potential customers might be a potential draw, except for one fact — capitulating to censors would be against Google’s informal corporate motto: “Don’t be evil.”

Although evil is indeed a subjective quality, here it is not. The fact that a government (which laughingly calls itself the “People’s Republic of China”) would keep any information from its citizens automatically disqualifies it as being a republic of the people. Such a government is a republic of… the republic. Google is only skirting evil by acquiescing too China’s demands; Yahoo! is being downright evil by providing China with information it needs to prosecute dissenters.

A corporation should not be evil and in the United States, at least, Google isn’t. But what a difference a government makes. Google as a corporation (and all American companies for that matter) should stand for truth, equality, and making a profit — but the last goal should never come at the expense of the first two. If anything, Google should be doing everything it can to fight China’s censorship. It should answer the “People’s” government’s demand with a fuck you gleam in its eye, and a list of search results that inexplicably returns links to information about the Tiananmen Protests. And if the the PMRC doesn’t like it, then it can look elsewhere for a search engine for its sandboxed Internet.

Crap…

Monday, June 27th, 2005

US Supreme Court rules against Grokster.

This could set a precedent that might, in theory, make VCRs and tape decks illegal.

Not good, not good.

Retroactive Legislation?…

Sunday, March 27th, 2005

Hey, Congress… isn’t retroactive legislation unconstitutional? i.e., isn’t it illegal to make a law to punish one certain criminal more or to benefit one person exclusively?

SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

Monday, November 15th, 2004

Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! Support our troops! support our troops! SUPPORT our TROOPS! Support our troops! Support our troops! (Repeat ad infintium).

Answer Me This

Saturday, November 6th, 2004

Current Listening: Warren Zevon – “Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door” (The Wind)

Mama take this badge off of me / I don’t need it anymore / It’s getting dark, too dark to see / Feels like I’m knockin’ on heaven’s door / Knock knock knockin’ on heaven’s door

If our voting systems are so safe, despite the fact that Diebold’s CEO told Bush that he’s committed to delivering him votes in Ohio, then why don’t our officials soothe our fears and suspicions and give us proof of how secure and reliable this voting system is?

Just let us know. That’s all you have to do.

Hope For Tomorrow?

Thursday, November 4th, 2004

Current Listening: CCR – “Fortunate Son” (Chronicle)

Some folks are born silver spoon in hand, / Lord, don’t they help themselves, oh. / But when the taxman come to the door, / Lord, the house look a like a rummage sale,

Okay, so the votes are counted, and Bush won. For better or worse, we’re looking at another four years of Republican control. Since several Supreme Court justices are to retire sometime during Bush’s second term, there is a very real possibility that conservatives will control all three branches of US Government. This is a scary thought. But could it have a happy ending?

Take my state, Montana, as an example. Montana actually has one of the most progressive constitutions in the US, and for a long time was a left-leaning state. Then, something started happening. The economy started going downhill; Republicans started blaming the Democrats, and all of a sudden conservatives controlled all of Montana’s government.

That’s the way it’s stood for about a quarter-century. Our economy has been sliding into the crapper ever since. Businesses have been leaving, and we’ve been attacking the environment frequently. Things were beginning to look quite dark to some of us Montanans. Why are people consistently voting for Republicans when they’ve made the mess worse, we were asking ourselves. There weren’t easy answers. All we knew is that Montana was heavily leaning toward the right, and the poor Democrats couldn’t do anything right. I fact, they looked like everything, trying all sorts of tricks to regain control.

Then, Judy Martz was elected governor (governess?). And boy, did she screw up. If there’s any politician who could possibly be a challenger to George the Younger’s claim to Biggest Idiot in Office, it would be her. She kowtowed to corporations. She proclaimed herself the ‘lapdog of industry.’ She was an accessory to a vehicular homicide when she washed the defendant’s bloody clothes. And the people hated her. Not just the Democrats, who’ve been programmed from their teens to hate the other team. Everybody.

And she was enough to get the Republicans out of office. This election, we voted in a Democratic governor, state attorney, and one of our houses switched control to the Democrats. For the first time in some two decades, our government was balanced again. All because of an idiot politician, elected because of her party’s sway.

So, maybe Montana is ahead of the curve. Maybe Americans will see that, while George Bush is likeable, he and his ilk are not the best choice to lead America. Maybe Montana is a kind of oracle for the rest of the country.

Something to think about.